Comparative Study of Technology Options against Mung bean Yellow Mosaic and Mung Bean Yield parameters
Comparative Study of Technology options against Mung bean Yellow Mosaic and Mung bean Yield parameters
Abstract
Efficacy of different technology options (T1: Farmers practice, T2: Azadirachtin 0.03% @ 2.5 l/ha (2 sprays), T3: Two sprays of Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 250 ml/ ha and T4: Two sprays of Dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.5 l/ ha for management of MYMV and yield parameters of mung bean. On Farm Trial (OFT) was conducted at farmer’s field of Kishanganj district by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kishanganj, Bihar during rabi-summer 2017. Maximum (33.13 %) reduction of disease over control was observed in T3 (Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 250 ml/ ha) followed by T4 (Dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.5 l/ ha) and T2 (Azadirachtin 0.03% @ 2.5 l/ha) with 26.95 and 25.07 per cent reduction in disease over control. Grain yield of 12.37, 11.23 and 10.32 q/ ha were obtained with T3 (Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 250 ml/ ha), T4 (Dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.5 l/ ha) and T2 (Azadirachtin 0.03% @ 2.5 l/ha), respectively. The B:C ratios of technology options were in the range of 1:1.69 to 1: 1.82. The B: C ratio was found maximum (1: 8.2) for T3(Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 250 ml/ ha) followed by T4 (Dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.5 l/ ha) and T2 (Azadirachtin 0.03% @ 2.5 l/ha) with B: C ratio of 1.69 and 1.48, respectively. The application imadicloprid (systemic insecticide) contributed more seed yield compared with control by